Comments on: The most intrusive Government database ever? http://www.iancuddy.com/2009/08/07/the-most-intrusive-government-database-ever/ digital content / media / post-egovernment and other things Sun, 18 Apr 2010 07:43:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Information Sharing Orders Plan B - Your Citizen Record will be Integrated not Shared | The Wardman Wire http://www.iancuddy.com/2009/08/07/the-most-intrusive-government-database-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Information Sharing Orders Plan B - Your Citizen Record will be Integrated not Shared | The Wardman Wire Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:00:50 +0000 http://www.iancuddy.com/?p=107#comment-19 [...] Well, Plan B to circumvent the Data Protection Act may have surfaced: rather than sharing data we will all have an “Integrated Citizen Record”. Via Ian Cuddy: [...] [...] Well, Plan B to circumvent the Data Protection Act may have surfaced: rather than sharing data we will all have an “Integrated Citizen Record”. Via Ian Cuddy: [...]

]]> By: Denny http://www.iancuddy.com/2009/08/07/the-most-intrusive-government-database-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Denny Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:41:24 +0000 http://www.iancuddy.com/?p=107#comment-18 Yikes. Thanks for calling attention to this, I hadn't heard about it until now. Would you be interested in re-posting this article on Police State UK*? It's exactly the kind of content we're interested in. * http://policestate.co.uk Yikes. Thanks for calling attention to this, I hadn't heard about it until now.

Would you be interested in re-posting this article on Police State UK*? It's exactly the kind of content we're interested in.

* http://policestate.co.uk

]]> By: Matt Wardman http://www.iancuddy.com/2009/08/07/the-most-intrusive-government-database-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Matt Wardman Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:29:11 +0000 http://www.iancuddy.com/?p=107#comment-17 This *sounds* - without having read the report (busy) - like an attempt to achieve the effect of Information Sharing Orders smuggled into Clause 152 (?) of the Coroners and Justice Bill at the start of the year, where Ministers would be able to direct data sharing across departments regardless of the Data Protection Act. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7852480.stm The Govt backed down on that one - when rumbled: http://www.information-age.com/channels/security-and-continuity/news/1009117/government-to-rethink-informationsharing-orders.thtml "’strictly’ controlled" and the rest is just guff, as we have learned with other laws. Sigh. Another intrusive fox to be shot. This *sounds* - without having read the report (busy) - like an attempt to achieve the effect of Information Sharing Orders smuggled into Clause 152 (?) of the Coroners and Justice Bill at the start of the year, where Ministers would be able to direct data sharing across departments regardless of the Data Protection Act.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7852480.stm

The Govt backed down on that one - when rumbled:

http://www.information-age.com/channels/security-and-continuity/news/1009117/government-to-rethink-informationsharing-orders.thtml

"’strictly’ controlled" and the rest is just guff, as we have learned with other laws.

Sigh. Another intrusive fox to be shot.

]]>